gravityeyelids: (Default)
[personal profile] gravityeyelids
via http://ift.tt/2mnAKIs:
The Laundress
...was considered provocative in the 1760s...
That gaze
...the exposed stocking and slipper
A critic at the time even said...
"This little laundress is charming..."
"...but she's a rascal I wouldn't trust an inch."
k.
butim-justharry:

licieoic:

rush-keating:

npr:

thegetty:

The story behind The Laundress.

This is so good. -Emily

I find that hard to reconcile with how 18th century dresses had boobs practically hanging out of them. Maybe the chest wasn’t as sexualized as the ankles were back then…

I have a dim memory from back in high school… I think someone once told me that breasts were no big deal back in corsetry-and-necklines-down-to-there days, they were considered a food source for children and that’s it.

But ANKLES. Oh, GOD. ANKLES. The ANKLE was connected to the LEG, which connected to THIGHS, which hid a woman’s SECRET FLOWER. The ankle was the gateway to the secret flower, so it was considered quite a stirring sight!

I have never considered that “leg bone connected to the ankle bone” song as a sexy tune before but
(Your picture was not posted)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

gravityeyelids: (Default)
Rachel

April 2019

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 29th, 2026 06:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios