Oct. 23rd, 2016

gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2eyuBlF:
allophobia:

what society needs to understand is that friendship and romance are not ranks, tiers, or levels. they are not above or below each other. romance is not a promotion. friendship is not a demotion. romance is not “more than” being friends with someone. friendship and romance are concepts that exist on equal terms, side by side. sometimes they happen to coincide. other times they never intersect at all. how relationships are classified is up to the individuals involved but like?? neither is inherently more or less valuable is the thing
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2eyuSFf:
bergamotandrose:

sandandglass:

The Daily Show, October 6, 2016

Lmao
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2et0gqC:
swevenfox:

This was a lil commission picked from FR because of reasons. They wanted a fox - a fox. I could not refuse that. Missed drawing foxes and this was especially tempting - a star-fox. 

A star-fox.

This was so much fun oAo
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2dZui1v:
leftist-daily-reminders:

blue-author:

theuppitynegras:

I’m about 90% sure the economy is never gonna “improve” 

this is capitalism in it’s final form

this is it honey 

It’s not new information, though. It’s misinformation.

First, it’s not that new.

Did you know that there was a time in U.S. history—which is by definition recent history—when a corporation was generally intended to have some sort of public interest that they served? I mean, that’s the whole point of allowing corporations to form. Corporations are recognized by the commonwealth or state, and this recognition is not a right but a privilege, in exchange for which the state (representing the people) is allowed to ask, “So what does this do for everyone else?”

The way the economy is now is a direct result of a shift away from this thinking and to one where a corporation is an entity unto itself whose first, last, and only concern is an ever-increasing stream of profits. What you’re calling “benevolent capitalism” isn’t benevolent at all. It’s a pure profit/loss calculation designed to distract from—not even paper over or stick a band-aid on—the problems capitalism creates. And the fact that you’re here championing it as “benevolent capitalism” is a sign of how ell it’s working.

Let’s take Toms, as one example. The shoe that’s a cause. Buy a pair of trendy shoes, and a pair of trendy shoes will be given away to someone somewhere in the world who can’t afford them.

That’s not genuine benevolence. That’s selling you, the consumer, on the idea that you can be benevolent by buying shoes, that the act of purchasing these shoes is an act of charity. The reality is that their model is an inefficient means of addressing the problems on the ground that shoelessness represents, and severely disrupts the local economies of the locations selected for benevolence.

(Imagine what it does to the local shoemakers, for instance.)

The supposed act of charity is just a value add to convince you to spend your money on these shoes instead of some other shoes. It’s no different than putting a prize in a box of cereal.

Heck, you want to see how malevolent this is?

Go ask a multinational corporation that makes shoes or other garments to double the wages of their workers. They’ll tell you they can’t afford it, that it’s not possible, that consumers won’t stand for it, that you’ll drive them out of business and then no one will have wages.

But the fact that a company can give away one item for every item sold shows you what a lie this is. A one-for-one giving model represents double the cost of labor and materials for each unit that is sold for revenue. Doubling wages would only double the labor.

So why are companies willing to give their products away (and throw them away, destroy unused industry with bleach and razors to render them unsalvageable, et cetera) but they’re not willing to pay their workers more?

Because capitalism is the opposite of benevolence.

“Charity” is by definition exemplary, above and beyond, extraordinary, extra. “Charity” is not something that people are entitled to. You give people a shirt or shoes or some food and call it charity, and you’re setting up an expectation that you can and will control the stream of largesse in the future, and anything and everything you give should be considered a boon from on high.

On the other hand, once you start paying your workers a higher wage, you’re creating an expectation. You’re admitting that their labor is more valuable to you than you were previously willing to admit, and it’s hard to walk that back.

Plus, when people have enough money for their basic needs, they’re smarter and stronger and warier and more comfortable with pushing back instead of being steamrolled over. They have time and money to pursue education. They can save money up and maybe move away. They can escape from the system that depends on a steady flow of forced or near-forced labor.

So companies will do charitable “buy one, give one” and marketing “buy one, get one” even though these things by definition double the overhead per unit, but they won’t do anything that makes a lasting difference in the standard of living for the people.

Capitalism has redefined the world so that the baseline of ethics is “How much money can we make?” and every little good deed over and above that is saintly.

But there’s nothing benevolent about throwing a scrap of bread to someone who’s starving in a ditch because you ran them out of their home in the first place.

This is one of the best anti-capitalist posts on the entire site.
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2dZs5n5:
nerdgasrnz:

We were on Hanamura and then-

One Nano-Boosted, Soldier 76 ult and POTG later:
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2ebShfK:
You: later gator
Me, an intellectual: the future holds a large reptile
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2dxPxve:
devxtchka:

bixbiboom:

therealeggdeity:

sharklord:

mechanicuscat:

gifsandsound:

Doot doot doot doot doot doot doot- doot doot doot- dooooo

(10:00)

In the hall of the mountain king

the floofiest munchkin

why would anyone think its ok to breed a cat to look like this?

munchkin cats are a result of a naturally occurring genetic mutation, it’s not a result of cats having their legs bred down for their short size as is the case for daschunds. munchkin cats experience no physical deformities or abnormalities in their legs or as a result of their legs

I absolutely refused to believe that comment and went to look for myself. Turns out it’s true, munchkins are extremely healthy breeds. The mutation only affects health in the fetal stage, which means unhealthy kittens don’t survive to be born at all and never suffer. Rarely they experience a curvature of the spine called lordosis, and cats with this condition are very short-lived, but this isn’t unique to munchkins and can affect cats of all sizes.

So I’ve been railing against the breeding of munchkin cats for years for no reason, apparently. Sorry, cats.

Justice for munchkin owners
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2etXy5N:
the person he's commenting to is my tía. she's upset by his actions to me.
(he's bad at communicating but i think he was SIGNING it "daddy"... idk)
this was the first big blowup.
this was in august when he was cooperating slightly w/ us getting stuff
????????
he literally wont talk to me w/out bringing my mother up
he never followed through with letting me take control of the account
nobody in my life rly has died since his dad so what does that mean
hi im salem! ily! this is the photo he hates & its not my bathroom! [they/them]
THESE ME CATS I LOVE THEM YOU'RE HELPING THEM TOO
gayspacenerds:

i’ve made this post like 5x now but HERE WE GO AGAIN…

i have an injunction hearing against my dad on tuesday, oct 25

he says he’s suing me for attorney’s fees because i finally had enough of being terrified of him (we work at the same place and he knows where i live) to try to file an injunction and told the court about what’s been going on since i was named in a court order that allowed me and one other person (the one he was commenting on her fb photo), both of us disabled, to go collect my mom’s stuff from his house

the house i inherited and he harassed, intimidated, bullied, and abused me into signing over to him after a DV incident involving a gun after which he was baker acted. he blames the entire incident on me.

he’s stolen around $3500 from me after coercing me into letting him “borrow” $2k during the divorce, and now he won’t sign over the account that held it, which he has long promised to do - also an inherited item from his father, one he now feels entitled to

he’s been gaslighting me, emotionally and psychologically abusing me, denying me medical care, etc since i was a child. it only turned physical once but that was enough to cause lasting damage to me.

he apparently hates me now vs. a few months ago because he found out just how involved i am in the activist community locally. i organized our local vigil after pulse, i attend BLM actions, i sit on panels for LGBTQ community topics, etc. i’m a trans educator, advocate, and activist (??) in my very unfriendly conservative community and he HATES that shit.

i’m moving 900 miles away from this mess, his violence, etc in just over a month but i need help to do it because that was the money i wanted to use in order to do it.

i’m on medical leave right now from work because my anxiety has gone through the roof and i am having a very difficult time functioning there after being blown off by HR when i told them about the situation.

this is the fundraiser to help me get out of here. i have an apartment secured, i have a couple of job leads that i’m hoping will be successful, but i’m starting over completely with my four cats and no friends in my new area.

please eject me from this hellswamp safely with my sweet cat family and into the safe situation i can have far, far away from this place. i’m so fucking close.

thank you all for the support i have received so far, including the kind messages of support and sympathy from other survivors, please boost this far and wide, i love you all so much
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2dZurSV:
sassy-gay-justice:

strategicgoat:

strategicgoat:

ply-positive:

queer-coffee:

ply-positive:

elecocochoco:

mellbeh:

pastel-prouvaire:

themerrymisnomer:

scaredlittlebug:

hufflepuffjeditimelord:

ok so hear me out, “gaydar” but for bisexuality

BI-FI

“are you getting any Bi-Fi in here” “i only have like two bars of bi-fi” “why is there no bi-fi in here” “the bi-fi signal is great in here”

and my favorite: “what’s the bi-fi password?”

and for pansexuals? PAN-SCAN

I made a bi-fi icon:

this is beautiful

@sicklesbian @lightgetsout

@elecocochoco

Jumped on that bandwagon

Quickly somebody do a ply spy

Here you go! Just had to!

Woah this is really great!!

Apparently a “tracer” is a detective - I find that fitting for an Ace Trace

I made ace trace

Oh my god I love all of these
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2dZvbr5:
maralie:

i really love our generation’s joke trend of like, very calm but incredibly inflated hyperbole. like nobody says “oh she’s pretty” anymore we say “i would willingly let her murder me” and everyone is just like “lol same”

i think “same” is also great and “me,” i love when somebody reblogs a picture of like, a lizard, and just says “me” and we all know exactly what they mean. the current online Humor Discourse is remarkable because we trade exclusively in metaphors and implications and nobody ever, ever says anything outright and yet EVERYBODY understands each other perfectly
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2dZwk1U:
memeufacturing:

gently hugging two birds with one me
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2dzcYzL:
wnq-anonymous:

Comics by Colleen Butters Perfectly Describe What It Is Like to Deal with Depression
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2ekOqAJ:
qinni:

Slower Video on YouTube here

freehand gouache speedpainting stuff. was playing with colours :3. 

Tools:Holbein acrylic gouache http://amzn.to/2eevDmnWindsor Newton Designer Gouache: http://amzn.to/2eb5hpolocal art store brushesSome random marker paper i didn’t want. lol :P

Music: Kamiyama jun'ichi - natsunoowarini

Instagram | deviantArt | FaceBook | Youtube
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2eHj6GV:

theanimalvines:

Omg, he’s trying to sing along

cute animal vines?
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2dzu8SF:
mahdic:

mahdic:

amir khusrow (1253–1325 CE)

lmao i’m so happy and surprised to see how this thing blew up. this style of poetry is actually an entire genre in hindavi literature. it is a type of folk poetry called kah mukarni, and it involves two playful female speakers seemingly speaking about their lovers and ending in a wordplay. they’re very earthy-sounding in their folk performances, and they are traditionally sung by women. here’s another one by khusrow that i like:

p.s. these are all from sunil sharma’s translations (which is prob as good as it gets in translation)
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2eIhjTf:
sarlisart:

sarlisart:

hello! i’ve got a few apparel items coming out this fall, and i’m looking for some cute models to wear them! you will be paid :-)

everyone is welcome ofc (as long as you can get to the d.c. area), just email me a few photos of yourself, a brief description of your style, your social media links and when you’re available! my email is sarlisart@gmail.com ♡

the model search will end on monday oct. 24th, thanks for reading ♡

ending tomorrow!! 👏👀
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2edKGxt:
geekybibliophile:

themadcapmathematician:

knightofocean:

undeceased:

German Shepherd Dog painted in time for Halloween. (x)

SPOOPY PUPPY

As much as I love this photo set…no one ever includes the best part of it:

THE PAINT IS GLOW IN THE DARK

THIS LITTLE DOGGY RAN AROUND ALL NIGHT LIKE A GLOWING SKELLY REAPER PUP

(づ₀☆w☆₀)づ

@zombeesknees
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2dzInGT:
fandomsandfeminism:

Alex is an amazing gender fluid trans bad ass, and I love her so far part 1.
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2elGHT2:
hectocotyli-everywhere:

chickadee-sun:

godzillakiryu91:

godzillakiryu91:

hectocotyli-everywhere:

DISCLAIMER: My claims that the lemon shark is an unstoppable mafia lord are conscious exaggerations for the sake of comedy. These statements are jokes and should not be taken seriously. Do not seriously spread negative stereotypes about sharks, they already have a bad enough rep.

Yes, folks, today I leave prehistory behind for a while, and return to nowadays times. Because honestly, you don’t need to moonwalk five hundred squillion years backwards into the past to find stuff in the sea that is not only scary, but also downright surreal.

But what do you do when you want something so surreal that even the weirdest hydrothermal vents pale in comparison?

Enter the mangrove forests, which were probably created when God decided to do away with that whole silly “internal logic” thing, and really express himself for once. The end result was a biome that feels like it was assembled using a random generator.

Grab something because I’m about to talk about this place and some shit is about to go down.

The thing about mangrove forests is that they’re basically forests that stand right on ocean shores. This means that during high tide, the trees literally stand in extremely salty water that is in no way beneficial for your skin, for hours on end, every single day. Trees are in no fucking way intended to withstand, let alone thrive in salt water, that’s like throwing a land slug into the sea and watching it shrivel up and die, it’s sadistic. There is an ungodly amount of specialization needed to even survive in this hellish saline environment, why the fuck would anything willfully live here?!

Naturally, whatever lives in the environment created by the mangrove trees must employ some insane specializations just to live another day. To survive in here is a true sign of badassitude, which is exactly why it’s called the MANgrove forest. We have already done a previous endeavor into these saline woods when reviewing the banded archerfish, and we’re just getting started. Let’s start with the fact that the trees themselves pretty much give live birth, with the seeds sprouting while still hanging from the mother tree and growing into little saplings before falling onto the ground. And the animals that inhabit this surreal wonderland are even worse. Not only are these creatures badass, they are also incredibly weird, the strange environment resulting in such things as tree-dwelling oysters, proboscis monkeys sharing an environment with fucking crabs, and of course, the astoundingly creatively-named lemon shark.

Dear fucking god the lemon shark.

It’s a Shiny!

Negaprion brevirostris is a species of shark inhabiting coastal waters around the Americas and Western Africa. It’s basically a very likeable shark chomping on everything that comes into its path. I mean, look at this guy, how can you not love him?

Okay, I’ll admit, not everybody shares my aesthetic taste in “likeable” animals, but still. This is one handsome shark.

Lemon sharks belong to the incredibly badass-named group of “requiem sharks”, which also contains the dreaded tiger shark. They are sleek and fast sharks mostly inhabiting coasts, and they have a tendency to get lumped in with the mackerel sharks (where the Great White is classified) into a group of “this is all sharks, all of them, and they all eat humans, yup”. Although admittedly, some people have bigger problems with their classification than that.

*facepalm*

Idiotic questions aside, their sexy, sexy yellow color provides them with a perfect mimicri to blend into the sand in their coastal environment. Nature runs on an odd logic that doesn’t always follow ours, which means that the stealthiest animal around the mangrove forests is a 3 meters long garish yellow shark. Go figure.

While they’re always coastal, they regularly cycle between regular ocean shores and mangrove shores. They visit mangrove forests to give birth (they give live birth, by the way), and stay there for several years until their pups are grown enough to fuck off back to the regular coasts. Honestly though, raising a kid in the mangrove forest is like throwing them off Taigetos, except that you’re not doing it to get rid of the kid but instead you think it’s a valid model for parenting. And it works, because these aren’t any pasty-ass wimp humans, these are sharks.

Interestingly, they live in groups and even have some social dynamics, along with a pretty developed brain compared to most sharks. That means that you piss off one of them, and you have to face not a single shark, but an entire clan of them.

Gentlemen, we have assembled today to determine the precise way in which we kick that dumb tourist’s ass.

And that’s something you do not ever want to experience, since these guys are one of the extremely few sharks that are ACTUALLY man-eaters. Now don’t get me wrong, this doesn’t mean that us yummy meatsacks are their primary food source. This just means that lemon sharks view humans as potential prey if - IF - they encounter us. This is due to the fact that one of their major prey items is this monkey, which often dives into the water to look for assorted garbage to eat. Because of this, a lemon shark might associate to one of these monkeys from the shape of a human, and may attack. Generally the best course of action is to steer clear of lemon sharks, just stay the fuck away from that shit. Everyone is happier that way, you don’t get eaten and the shark won’t be deepthroating the fishing equipment of the angry locals.

You should consider this a great honor.

Speaking of which! In the case of the lemon shark, “steer clear” wouldn’t just mean steering clear of the water, but generally steering clear of the entire fucking mangrove forest. Because that shit is the lemon shark’s territory and you’ll pay dearly if you infringe on it. What, you thought they were confined to the ocean coast? You silly goose, you.

You keep telling yourself that.

Don’t worry, I’m not talking actual land sharks… yet. Evolution is a wondrous thing.

However, they do come very close to fucking walking sharks, and they do it surprisingly easily. Remember what I said makes mangrove environments so hellish? That’s right, the ocean flooding the woods during every high tide. And that means that during high tide, the lemon shark is free to literally swim into the forest. And they do exactly that, visiting the forest to hunt for the various delicious shit living on the tree roots. I shit you not, during high tide it’s a legitimate possibility to bump into a shark in the fucking forest. So when the waters rise, the lemon shark is free to enact mafia-style revenge on the goddamned landdwwellers who have as much as slighted it during low tide. FEAR THE LEMON.

@theload

Oh and @chickadee-sun you might enjoy this too!

Uh, excuse you, mangrove forests are an excellent nursery! Large predators that might want to eat babby lemons have a hard time navigating the dense roots and shallow water. Meanwhile, mangrove forests are full of life like coral reefs–many coral reefs are downcurrent of mangroves and depend on organic matter from the less-glamorous forests! So much food for a growing babby. Adult lemon sharks spend much less time in mangrove forests than juveniles. Putting them in a different habitat and niche minimizes competition between generations. Is very good parenting idea, much recommend.

Also, mommy lemon sharks respond to environmental cues in mangrove swamps by suppressing their appetites or hunting instincts. Lemon sharks that give birth in captivity without those environmental cues often eat their own babies.

Important addition! Though I should add that that was more of a joke. The lemons would obviously choose a nesting ground that’s beneficial for them. The cannibalism part was new to me though.
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2exseP6:
why-animals-do-the-thing:

Hey guys, in case you didn’t notice by the giant insurgence of skeletons on your dash, it’s OCTOBER now. Which, of course, means we’re on the first day of the beloved month of Halloween. (This is a pro-spoopy blog, but I promise, I’ll never use that word again). And with Halloween comes costumes and with costumes comes the idea of putting our dogs in silly outfits.

Do you want to put your pet in a costume for Halloween? Great. Guess what? It’s time to start now! 

Here’s the thing. Most dogs are not a fan of clothes from the get-go. There are outliers who love to be dolled up (although often that’s thought to be because they’re tight, like thundershirts) but most dogs end up being either purposefully or accidentally conditioned to wear their outfits. You know the dogs that looks miserable in their costumes or try to run from them or just tear them to shreds? Those are the pets who got stuffed into it for the first time for the party. 

So here’s what you do: you buy a costume now, and you start training your dog that it’s the best thing in the world. Reward them for sniffing it or touching it or laying on it - leave it out for a while so they get used to it. And then start small - maybe put a boot on their foot (assuming they let you handle their feet - if your dog has issues with handling a body part, don’t put something on it). Reward them for tolerating it, and then take it off. Play that game a couple times a day with them in tiny increments. If you’ve got something that goes over their body, lift it up and encourage them to sniff it - then lure their head through the opening with a treat, and then take it off. Once you get it so they’re eagerly sticking their head through the neck for food, you can let it rest on them for a little bit. Same goes for securing it with velcro or snaps. Make sure you take it off of them again BEFORE the association gets negative! You want costume time to be the most exciting party they get to have. Once they’ll wear it, start with a small duration and then build up time they’re wearing it as you get closer to Halloween!

This way, your dog won’t be miserable on Halloween in his costume! If he’ll be at parties, think about other aspects like how to keep him out of food or keep his costume from getting stuck on stuff. If he goes trick-or-treating, make sure you can put his harness or leash on around the costume and that the costume doesn’t interefere with the gear. Get him used to walking around on it before the night! 

Have a safe and happy Halloween Month, everyone! 
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2eIlm1X:
poopsonthemoon:

funnyandhilarious:

Star Trek Stabilized »

Now my favourite gif.
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2elOX5q:
malmao:

mustardprecum:

gay-duck:

Guys please appreciate my adorable tiny Jewish physiology teacher and his shirt

Reblogging for the shirt, and the poster behind him

i love him
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2edSlM8:
methlabrador:

whats the meaning of life? son, its those little tiny pumpkins. the ones that are mad small.  you know the ones i mean. 
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2edVrjd:
alongcameabutterfly:

My body is magical.
Every hill and valley.
Every dip and turn.
Every bump & roll.
Pure intergalactic magic
👽☄✨

Photography|Taylor Giavasis for The Naked Diaries

(NOT FOR BBW BLOGS)

{thebutterflyeffect]
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2exAOgT:
nailpornography:

Spooky NOTW inspiration!
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2exBdzT:
whoopsrobots:

reversingyourpolarity:

hello-hayati:

materassassino:

samuel-vimes:

lierdumoa:

I was reading this article that was complaining about people should be more focused on bringing characters that were originally conceived as POC to the screen than on recasting white characters as POC. 

Which I actually agree with.

But in the same article the writer complained (I’m paraphrasing) “If you cast a black guy as Tony Stark, no one will think of him as Tony Stark, they’ll always think of him as Black Tony Stark.”

I have to point out a big flaw in that logic:

Children.

Everyone in the older generation thinks of Obama as “the black president.” You know who doesn’t think of Obama as “the black president”? 10 year olds. Obama is the only president they can remember. He got elected when they were two.

There are children who listen to Fall Out Boys’ “Centuries” and don’t know they borrowed the opening riff from Suzanne Vega’s “Tom’s Diner.” As far as they’re concerned, that’s Fall Out Boy’s riff.

There are children who don’t remember that The Rock was Dwayne Johnson’s wrestling name.

My favorite version of  A Christmas Carol is The Muppet Christmas Carol. I don’t care how Bob Cratchit was written in the original story because as far as I’m concerned, the real Bob Cratchit is a bright green frog puppet that’s my canon you can’t stop me.

There are a dozen incarnations of every possible comic book character. And every vigilante superhero we read about today is based on the original vigilante superhero – The Scarlet Pimpernel. There is no real version, there is only your favorite version. Every version that isn’t your favorite is going to feel fake to you.

But it’s going to feel real to someone.

Nick Fury, I’m just saying.

If we went back to white Nick Fury, it would just be fucking WEIRD

dude i forgot that nick used to be a white irish guy

I regularly forget about white Nick Fury. So much so that the current iteration is just Nick Fury while the former has become ‘white nick fury’.
Also green lantern. We all know who was best.

My little brother (who’s six)  loves the avengers, and a while back he got some kind of retro avengers game to play on the DS, and about half an hour after he plugs it in I hear him freaking out and I ask him what’s wrong and he says “They ruined Nick Fury! The ruined him! They made him white and he’s got hair!” and honestly I’ve never heard him so betrayed. Six year old little white kid, btw, and he was so disappointed because it wasn’t OUR Nick Fury
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2evurNJ:
art-of-swords:

Yatagan Sword from the Court of Süleyman the Magnificent (reigned 1520–66)

Dated: circa 1525–30

Sword maker: Workshop of Ahmed Tekelü (possibly Iranian, active Istanbul, ca. 1520–30)

Geography: Istanbul

Culture: Ottoman, Istanbul

Medium: steel, gold, ivory (walrus), silver, turquoise, pearls, rubies

Measurements: overall length 23 3/8 inches (59.3 cm); blade length 18 3/8 inches (46.7 cm); weight 1 lb. 8 oz. (691 g)

Exquisite workmanship and lavish use of precious materials distinguish this sword as a princely weapon and exemplifies the opulence and refinement of Ottoman luxury arts. Almost identical to a yatagan (now in the Topkapi Palace, Istanbul) made in 1526–27 by the court jeweller Ahmed Tekel, for the Ottoman sultan Süleyman the Magnificent (r. 1520–66), this sword was undoubtedly made in the same imperial workshop.

The gold incrustation on the blade depicts a combat between a dragon and a phoenix against a background of foliage scrolls. These figures, like the gold-inlaid cloud bands and foliage scrolls on the ivory grips, are Chinese in inspiration, and were probably introduced into Ottoman art through contacts with Persia.

This sword is one of the earliest known yatagans, distinctly Turkish weapons characterised by a double-curved blade and a hilt without a guard. Yatagans were commonplace in Turkey and the Balkans in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries and served as sidearms for the elite troops known as Janissaries.

Source: Copyright © 2016 Metropolitan Museum of Art

Profile

gravityeyelids: (Default)
Rachel

April 2019

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 12:19 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios