Jun. 16th, 2017

gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2rxxCMl:
everoutoftouch:

jemthecrystalgem:

dragon-in-a-fez:

why “spanking is harmful” studies will, ultimately, never matter to parents who want to hit their kids:

@fandomsandfeminism wrote a great post recently about the fact that we have, essentially, a scientific consensus on the fact that all forms of hitting children, including those euphemistically referred to as “spanking”, are psychologically harmful. they’ve also done an amazing job responding to a lot of parents self-admitted abusers who think “I hit my child and I’m okay with that” and/or “I was hit as a child and I don’t think there’s anything wrong with me” are more meaningful than 60 years of peer-reviewed research.

unfortunately, I’m here to tell you why all of that makes very little difference.

in 2014, a couple of researchers from UCLA and MIT named Alan Fiske and Tage Rai published a book called Virtuous Violence, the result of a major study of the motivations for interpersonal violence. Rai wrote a shorter piece about it in Quartz, which is a pretty light but still illuminating (hah, I did not see that pun coming but I’m gonna leave it) read.

the upshot of Fiske and Rai’s work is that most violence is fundamentally misunderstood because we think it is inherently outside the norms of a supposedly moral society. we presume that when someone commits a mass shooting or beats their spouse they are somehow intrinsically broken, either incapable of telling right from wrong or too lacking in self-control to prevent themselves from doing the wrong thing.

but what Fiske and Rai found was that, in fact, the opposite is true: most violence is morally motivated. people who commit violent acts aren’t lacking moral compasses - they believe those violent acts are not only morally acceptable, but morally obligatory. usually, these feelings emerge in the context of a relationship which is culturally defined as hierarchical. in other words, parents who commit violence against their children do so because they believe it is necessary that they do so in order to establish or affirm the dominance which they feel they are owed by both tradition and moral right.

when abusive parents say that they are “hitting children for their own good”, they are not speaking in terms of any rational predictions for the child’s future, but rather from a place of believing that the child must learn to be submissive in order to be a “good” child, to fulfill their place in the relationship.

this kind of violence is not the result of calm, intellectually reasoned deliberation about the child’s well-being. for that reason and that reason alone it will never be ended by scientific evidence.

history tells us more than we need to verify this. the slave trade and the institution of racial slavery, and their attendant forms of “corrective” physical violence, for instance, did not end because someone demonstrated they were physically or psychologically harmful to slaves - that was never a question in people’s minds to begin with. for generations, slavery was upheld as right and good not because it was viewed as harmless, but because it was viewed as morally necessary that one category of people should be “kept in their place” below another by any means necessary, because they were lower beings by natural order and god’s law. this violence ended because western society became gradually less convinced of the whole moral framework at play, not because we needed scientists to come along and demonstrate that chain gangs and whippings were psychologically detrimental. this is only one example from a world history filled with many, many forms of violence, both interpersonal and structural, which ultimately were founded on the idea that moral hierarchies must be maintained through someone’s idea of judiciously meted-out suffering.

and this, ultimately, is why we cannot end violence against children by pointing out that it is harmful - because the question of whether or not it is harmful does not enter into parents’ decisions about whether or not to commit violence in the first place. what they care about is not the hypothetical harm done to the child, but the reinforcement of the authority-ranked nature of the relationship itself. the reason these people so often sound like their primary concern is maintaining their “right” to hit their children is because it is. they believe that anyone telling them they can’t hit their children is attempting to undermine the moral structure of that individual relationship and, in a broader sense, the natural order of adult-child relations in society.

and that’s why the movement has to be greater than one against hitting kids. it has to be a movement against treating them as inferior, in general. it has to be a movement that says, children are people, that says children’s rights are human rights, that says the near-absolute authority of parents, coupled with the general social supremacy of adults and the marginalization of youth, have to all be torn down at once as an ideology of injustice and violence. anything less is ultimately pointless.

^^^

So sorry I haven’t read through this yet but thought I’d tag @the-evil-twin @gravityeyelids
(Your picture was not posted)
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2s7Y6Tm:
goodgirlargo:

Labyrinth (2012) - 
Oriane Congost   1/?
(Your picture was not posted)
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2s83S7e:
gc2b-apparel:

stargogh:

binders at gc2b.com  are 15% off for one item since it is pride month so take advantage of it my pals (use the code PRIDE15)

get 20% off  orders of two or more items with the code PRIDE20 !!!!
(Your picture was not posted)
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2ry6dK7:
lmao to be fair, she’s right, i’m not THAT old!!!
(Your picture was not posted)
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2shvqWl:
@theultravioletcatastrophe said to do this, so here we are.

The first several are screenshots I’ve taken. The rest are internet finds :D

I tag all of you!
(Your picture was not posted)
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2rxQqLm:
batmanisagatewaydrug:

julad:

thisdiscontentedwinter:

salparadisewasright:

sapphicdalliances:

jonpertwee:

hamfistedbunvendor:

jonpertwee:

I feel like this would be a slippery slope towards making it illegal for people to choose to not vote.

that’s already how it is in australia

That’s just so fucked up. :( Do certain medical conditions exempt you?

?????? why is it be fucked up to have compulsory voting? that’s the way it is in most democratic countries? it’s a part of being a citizen, like paying taxes and obeying speed limits? the fine for not voting is only like $50 and because of the compulsory voting law, our country bends over backwards to make it accessible: it’s always on a weekend, lasts most of the day, and is set up at schools and community centers so there’s one within easy reach of almost everybody. you can also mail your ballot or vote early if you’ll be out of the country on the day. like, IT’S EASY TO VOTE, and the penalty isn’t even that ridiculous. i don’t understand why the usa doesn’t have this, except obviously it would make it harder to literally stop minorities from voting.

I think we Americans tend to forget that a lot of other countries don’t actively work to make it harder to vote.

Adding to this here, in Australia you don’t have to vote. Or, more precisely, there’s no way they can tell if you ruined your ballot. You have to turn up, get your name marked off, but you can put a line through the ballot if you don’t think any of the candidates are worth voting for. Or do this: 

Or this: 

Or this: 

You have get your name crossed off (if you don’t want to wear the fine), but you don’t have to make your vote counted if you’re opposed to it. 

And it is so, so easy to vote. Stuck at work or on holidays? That’s fine. Do a postal vote.  Stuck in hospital? That’s fine. They’ll go to you. Stuck in an old people’s home and can’t get around? Again, they’ll go to you. It’s amazing to me that it’s so hard for so many Americans to actually vote. If you make it compulsory, than at least the government is obligated to provide you with the means to vote. 

And look, I get it. Sometimes I don’t want to vote either. But I suck it up, I walk three minutes down the street, and I hope that this year they’re selling lamingtons again. Oh, and I buy a democracy sausage, which, even if all the candidates suck, makes the effort of turning up pretty worthwhile. 

ALSO, you can see even on the fucked up ballots that you NUMBER CANDIDATES IN ORDER OF PREFERENCE. There’s no need to calculate whether I would be throwing away my vote on the candidate that I most agree with if they’re not from a major party. I can say, I want that independent person to get in, but if not them, give me Big Party A, and if not them, that minor party person is still better that Big Party B, and I’m not giving any preference to the Lunatic Fringe Party.

Our system certainly has some issues still, but I can show up to somewhere nearby, line up for a few minutes (if at all), vote exactly in line with my values (on paper, leaving a paper trail that can be recounted), and then buy a sausage and some home made cupcakes on my way out.

A country’s voting system matters a hell of a lot and every citizen deserves one that makes it easy to vote and results in a government that is representational and accountable.

And by the way, one time I had a bad asthma flare-up on Election Day and didn’t make it to my polling station. I got my fine in the mail, I filled out the form explaining why I couldn’t vote, no more fine. I would rather have, you know, expressed my preference for who should run my country, but they were cool with the fact that I couldn’t do it that day.

“oh no, what if people actually have to participate in picking the government officials who will impact their lives” jesus christ
(Your picture was not posted)
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2rxLciU:
tastyrepulsorboots:

aspidelaps:

samlones:

too-kawaii-to-die:

OH. MY.GOSH!! THIS LITTLE BIRD ACTUALLY HAS A COAT ON.!!!!!!!!

SO FREAKING CUTE!!!

Is that a fucking kookaburra

that is a fucking kookaburra in a rain coat with a happy frog on it

kookaburra sits in the old gum tree

wearing the cutest effing coat you’ve ever seen

@redacuarela
(Your picture was not posted)
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2shre9d:
green-love-paternoster:

feevidosa:

by popular demand…..tag urself i’m chaotic femme

@thegaysoiree I’m Neutral Futch
(Your picture was not posted)

Photo

Jun. 16th, 2017 11:38 am
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2rxXNT4:
(Your picture was not posted)
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2ryvXGu:
suspend:

LIKING SOMEONE IS SO STRESSFUL
(Your picture was not posted)
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2rzveVs:
ceruleancynic:

notcuddles:

titusnowl:

rosedai:

tbh i dont get why most people assume that robots are always cold

like have u felt a laptop while its working? its kinda not exactly cold yo

tbh any piece of machinery thats working hard to function is usually not cold, the only time its ever cold is when its turned off

so id like to think while a robot is awake and functioning they could have the potential to be as warm as a human being :0

never thought about this before but now it’s obvious

although like i hope they’ve actually improved cooling tech by the time they’re building androids bc my laptop can actually get so hot it makes THE ROOM hot and it’s only the size of a laptop so potentially an android who was thinking very hard would be a veritable furnace 

think too hard, overheat, faint

fainting couches for androids omg

Fainting couches for androids is the best possible thing

file under things i didn’t know i needed in my life
(Your picture was not posted)

Photo

Jun. 16th, 2017 07:03 pm
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2tw2Lfu:
(Your picture was not posted)
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2rzUpY0:
glassesanddreads:

things that make every video game better

give me nice outfits to wear

let me be gay

give me a pet
(Your picture was not posted)
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2syxyvf:
grammarmancer:

vasha-destroyer-of-worlds:

thebabadookblog:

I’m making this post because I’ve seen a lot of people in the tags saying they watched it and were not prepared

So for those of you interested but unsure:

The Babadook is a horror movie, it involves child abuse, animal abuse, animal death, loud screaming, blood, knives, cutting, having a knife pointed towards a child, and anxiety inducing moments

No jumpscares, but is more like a psychological thriller in terms of horror

I hope this helps! Happy babadook season!

@grammarmancer I think it was you that was wondering how scary the movie was? Hope this helps at all!

Oh, thank you!

Yeah, I tap out at animal abuse and I would have never guessed it was part of the movie based on what I’ve seen. This is def. good to know.
(Your picture was not posted)
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2sBAwzI:
scrunchie-face:

I love how, a month ago, this would have only been a one-level, hyperbolic joke about how avocados are kinda expensive.
Now, this is a multi-layer satirical joke with a specific cultural allusion. It takes the hyperbole of the initial joke and turns it against itself, reminding us that avocados are, in fact, NOT that expensive, in order to poke fun at a specific article that encapsulates the broader baby boomer/gen X attitude toward millennials.
In many ways, this joke accomplishes almost the exact opposite effect it would have a month ago. A month ago, it could have been used to prove the point it now ridicules. A month ago, it could have served as an example of the alleged frivolity of millenials. Now, however, with a newly acquired satirical ability, it actually serves as an example of how ridiculous criticism of the millennial generation can be.
Idk man. Sometimes I hate the internet. But shit like this makes me love it because it’s just straight-up fascinating.
(Your picture was not posted)
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2sBPXIc:
allthingslinguistic:

Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics is a writing system that uses letter rotation to indicate the accompanying vowel sound. It’s used to write Inuktitut, Cree, and sometimes also Ojibwe and Blackfoot. This brilliant visualization is from the Bachelor of Arts in Cree Language at University nuhelot’įne thaiyots’į nistameyimâkanak Blue Quills. 
(Your picture was not posted)
gravityeyelids: (Default)
via http://ift.tt/2skopnH:
finkspiration:

ironicmemeing:

gudthot:

so cute

@official-spec

WOW THIS IS CUTE, it’s so nice to see a boy allowed to act flustered
(Your picture was not posted)

Profile

gravityeyelids: (Default)
Rachel

September 2017

S M T W T F S
     1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 2627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 26th, 2017 08:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios